Comments on: Why use OSS in product development http://carlodaffara.conecta.it/?p=22 Open source software-based business models research Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:08:08 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Once More unto the Breach http://carlodaffara.conecta.it/?p=22&cpage=1#comment-2696 Once More unto the Breach Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:11:58 +0000 http://carlodaffara.conecta.it/?p=22#comment-2696 <strong>Open Source Software and Product Management Tools...</strong> Matt Asay has a great blog post today on what Alfresco has learned with regards to their use of open source and product management, from both the perspective of their own product development feedback, as well as the strength of...... Open Source Software and Product Management Tools…

Matt Asay has a great blog post today on what Alfresco has learned with regards to their use of open source and product management, from both the perspective of their own product development feedback, as well as the strength of……

]]> By: The procurement advantage, or a simple test for “purity” | carlodaffara.conecta.it http://carlodaffara.conecta.it/?p=22&cpage=1#comment-1513 The procurement advantage, or a simple test for “purity” | carlodaffara.conecta.it Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:41:21 +0000 http://carlodaffara.conecta.it/?p=22#comment-1513 [...] pure and the open core model the vendor has the added R&D sharing cost reduction (that, as I wrote about in the past, can provide significant advantages). But R&D is not the only advantage: the [...] [...] pure and the open core model the vendor has the added R&D sharing cost reduction (that, as I wrote about in the past, can provide significant advantages). But R&D is not the only advantage: the [...]

]]> By: Sorry, not right. An answer to Raymond’s post on the GPL | carlodaffara.conecta.it http://carlodaffara.conecta.it/?p=22&cpage=1#comment-190 Sorry, not right. An answer to Raymond’s post on the GPL | carlodaffara.conecta.it Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:12:32 +0000 http://carlodaffara.conecta.it/?p=22#comment-190 [...] that are relevant, and I agree with the fact that OSS is in general more efficient (as I wrote here, here and here). I disagree with both the premise and the conclusions, however, as I believe that [...] [...] that are relevant, and I agree with the fact that OSS is in general more efficient (as I wrote here, here and here). I disagree with both the premise and the conclusions, however, as I believe that [...]

]]> By: Estimating savings from OSS code reuse, or: where does the money comes from? | carlodaffara.conecta.it http://carlodaffara.conecta.it/?p=22&cpage=1#comment-62 Estimating savings from OSS code reuse, or: where does the money comes from? | carlodaffara.conecta.it Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:18:52 +0000 http://carlodaffara.conecta.it/?p=22#comment-62 [...] the case of 10Mlines of code, the saving is estimated at more than 210M€, that is consistent with previous estimates of savings by Nokia in reusing open source within Maemo. Even for the “small” [...] [...] the case of 10Mlines of code, the saving is estimated at more than 210M€, that is consistent with previous estimates of savings by Nokia in reusing open source within Maemo. Even for the “small” [...]

]]> By: On business models and their relevance | carlodaffara.conecta.it http://carlodaffara.conecta.it/?p=22&cpage=1#comment-2 On business models and their relevance | carlodaffara.conecta.it Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:38:52 +0000 http://carlodaffara.conecta.it/?p=22#comment-2 [...] this slide from Erkko Anttila’s thesis (more data in this previous post) it is possible to see how development effort (and cost) was shifted from the [...] [...] this slide from Erkko Anttila’s thesis (more data in this previous post) it is possible to see how development effort (and cost) was shifted from the [...]

]]>